Tuesday, April 10, 2007
A Random Thought
Lindsay Lohan vs. The Paps
Sony & Technology
I thought this was an interesting article to read on technology. Some people can’t afford to protect their home with alarms and home surveillance this PowerPod-LANC and software offers an affordable alternative to something that can be quite the budget breaker. Not only protecting certain areas of your home it can be used for video chatting, video conferencing and webcam video broadcasting over the web. Although it might not be the first choice for a home surveillance system it’s multi-features are good enough for average living.
http://www.hometoys.com/htinews/feb05/articles/eagletron/sony.htm
Paparazzi
Review - Is Britain Becoming a Surveillance Society?
When I read this article I was almost started to laugh at the fact that
Bush's Phone Taping Program
I would agree in President Bush’s Phone Tapping Program that would monitor the phone calls and e-mails of people who are in contact with people possibly linked to al-Qaida. With terrorism being a rising threat in the
http://voanews.com/english/archive/2006-01/2006-01-01-voa34.cfm?CFID=72781994&CFTOKEN=47959667
Cookies
Jimmy Kimmel on Galker Stalker
For those who have not heard/seen it, here is the link http://gawker.com/stalker/. This raises an interesting point. Are celebrities exempt from surveillance issues? Are they putting themselves out there for fame and to be filmed by anyone at anytime? Websites like Gawker Stalker I think are fair game as long as they are not real time. It is of some people's interest what celebrities do in their day to day lives and this site serves that purpose. There has to be some limit. Personally I feel that a website like this is fine, but if it was updated in real time it could be a danger to celebrities.
Here is the Video.. Enjoy!
Apology
Cheers!
Monday, April 9, 2007
Google Earth
A Humber College Student's opinion of Facebook and Surveillance
A Student's Opinion of Surveillance
"We have agreed to take part in things like facebook. The same can be said for the government, we have agreed to take part in it. Lets turn to good ol' hobbes to explain why.... the state of nature would make life "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short" Pretty much we would all go around protecting ourselves in any way we could, even if protecting ourselves means killing others....pretty much man against man... for example, kill someone for that last piece of meat. haha... So what do we do to avoid this situation? We give up our freedoms, we give up our right to privacy so that a BIG BROTHER type will come and protect us from the state of nature. In terms of cameras everywhere and such, that i suppose is just big brother protecting us from the state of nature. Is it right? Has it gone too far?...WHO IS WATCHING THE WATCHERS?....at what point do we say," okay back off now".. i mean with credit cards, banks cards, cell phones, cameras... people don't realise how easily they can be tracked down. after 911 we gave up alot of rights, most people don't even know that, will it get to the point that we all have chips implanted into our heads so that they can keep track of us? haha IT COULD HAPPENoh p.s. take a look at Britain, they have like 4 million cameras.... and alot of them are hidden, so you can't even see that you are being seen..... hmmm and is it even working?, read some reports and apparently not, it doesn't seem to be preventing anything"
UK tightens surveillance of students
Tidbits from an interesting article I read today..
British intelligence will be allowed to keep closer surveillance of foreign students who major in sensitive courses in
Okay, that makes a little bit of sense so I kept reading.......
Colleges are mandated to maintain a close watch on non-European students who study biological sciences, chemistry, nuclear physics, power engineering and metallurgy as the main focus of the new law.
This is crazyness! This has to be racial profiling, has
Today's Walk
Today I walked down Peter to Queen across Queen to John -John to
Enjoy!
Here is also an article I read..I think this has the potential to benefit society however; the province needs to really research to see if it’s going to be effective. So if this is part of that research then I think anything to help reduce crime in the city is a good thing. Although I strongly agree with Murray Hedges in saying that once perpetrators are caught we're not doing anything.
http://www.citynews.ca/news/news_7641.aspx
Sunday, April 8, 2007
1984
Peter Barret
Two Way Street
"Surviellance is a two way street ppl want to know that they will be safe and yet they do not want the privacy to be invaded"
- Graduate Student
Personal Opinion
"I feel it is so important to have certain locations under surveillance. In today’s society there is too much crime, fraud and violence that exists and although surveillance isn’t going to protect a person physically, it definitely offers some piece of mind; knowing that surveillance is being used as a tool to ensure one’s safety."
~ Carolyn Atyeo OCAD
Saturday, April 7, 2007
What are Cookies? Yum Yum
As Defined by --> http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Internet_surveillance
Spyware Defintion
"Software that gathers information about a user as he or she navigates around the Web, spyware is intended to track surfing habits in order to build marketing profiles. .... [and] information about your habits will be transmitted back to the company's Web site-but not information specifically about you." Although marketing spyware is not illegal, the way in which it works can be used as one technique for internet surveillance.
As Defined by --> http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Internet_surveillance

